The Lens

Is it just me, or does this feel like babysitting a delinquent pre-teen—one who got into his dad’s money vault and is now using it to bully people?

Every headline sparks the same thought: what the hell is he up to now?
And now you (the babysitter) have to figure out how to put out the fire.

Has Trump really paid off or neutralized Congress and the Supreme Court so completely that no one is willing to say anything—or do anything?

Because at this point, this is not a president.
This is a mob boss.

Why are we bombing Venezuela, but not Colombia or Mexico?
Because, hello—this has very little to do with cartels or drugs.

This is about Venezuela’s resources: their land’s overabundance of oil.

We have our own oil—so why do we need theirs?

Because Venezuela has the largest oil reserves on Earth.
Because with Venezuela, we would have more oil than Russia or Saudi Arabia.
Because controlling Venezuela means controlling future oil—and future oil prices.

So obviously, ethics are secondary to power calculations.
This is simply taking what isn’t ours by force—for money and power.

Oh yeah, you might think: “Not my circus, not my monkeys.”
(Funny how it’s a Polish proverb, given that the invasion of Poland is what started World War II.)

But listen—the moment the circus:

-drops bombs

-spends your money

-acts in your name

-claims moral authority for actions you’re implicated in

…it becomes your circus, whether you like it or not.

Actions are being taken on your behalf,
with your money,
under your flag.

This is like the civilian residents of Oświęcim (Auschwitz’s town) all over again—
pretending they don’t hear the gunshots or smell the burning flesh from the concentration camp.

We are a country of elected officials.
We chose him to represent us to the world.

Is this how you make America Great Again? By stealing?

So I ask: how do you sleep at night knowing America is a fu***ng monster now?

Proof:
---------------------------

2025 U.S. Strikes on Venezuelan Vessels: When Washington’s War on Drugs Reaches Venezuela’s Shores
https://www.britannica.com/event/2025-US-Strikes-on-Venezuelan-Vessels

How a Win in Venezuela Could Be Great News for Trump
https://www.newsweek.com/how-win-venezuela-could-be-great-for-trump-11123801

Understanding the Legal Ramifications of U.S. Strikes Against Venezuela
https://perryworldhouse.upenn.edu/news-and-insight/perry-world-house-qa-with-william-burke-white-understanding-the-legal-ramifications-of-u-s-strikes-against-venezuela/

I’ve come across many posts about feminism and misogyny, and here’s my take:

I do not feel anger toward men. Each man is autonomous and capable of exercising his own free will, regardless of what society teaches. When someone chooses to hurt others, that choice reflects an inability to recognize and examine the unhealthy sources of his own beliefs and actions—not a truth about men as a whole.

I am saddened by those who cannot adapt to change or take responsibility for the origins of their negative actions and beliefs.

Rightly, I may be wary of men who are physically larger and stronger, because they have the capacity to hurt me. But I do not fear or hate the boy they once were—the boy who wanted happiness and safety, just as I do.

-The Lens

------
Proofs:

https://profrjstarr.com/the-psychology-of-us/the-psychology-of-dehumanization-and-moral-disengagement

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mindfully-doing-what-matters/202405/humanizing-others-humanizing-ourselves
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9A04F6E4693375DD6F745384918E0DF2/S0887536723001058a.pdf/sexual_violence_and_two_types_of_moral_wrongs.pdf

Send a message to learn more

Did you know that despite having the most expensive health care, we have the lowest life expectancy of all developed English speaking countries.

wth

Proof:
-------
https://www.newsweek.com/us-population-life-expectancy-alarming-1938478?

https://www.iflscience.com/the-usa-has-lowest-life-expectancy-of-its-rich-english-speaking-peers-75580?

Oh Heck No!

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1RE7XpsBY3/

Being Texan, I need my steaks and ribs.
Being told to stop eating meat gives me anxiety LOL.
But I won’t ignore the data that mass-producing meat is bad for the planet. (1)

Aside from personal preferences, anthropologists also said our ancestors including meat in our diet helped us get smarter. (2)

I know, I know. We aren’t a hunter-gatherer society anymore, so evolutionary usefulness does not equal modern sustainability. But steaks, people. Steaks. Personally I reject “lettuce burgers.” (3)

So I analyzed it, and here is my solution:

If the Netherlands (a tiny country) became the second-largest food exporter in the world through technology (4), why can’t we fix this issue through technology?

And no, I’m not anti-space, but priorities, people.
If tech leaders have billions and can move fast, why isn’t sustainable meat production getting the same level of energy, money, and engineering talent?

Instead of pouring billions into moon and space data centers (5) and Mars experiments (cool, but not urgent), why aren’t we pushing the same level of tech innovation into sustainable meat production?

One saves our home, Earth.
The other is a flex.

I’m perfectly aware that geniuses usually don’t think practically, but shouldn’t you do your chores first before you go out to the garage and tinker with your next big invention?

So tech guys and girls, I dare you to prove me wrong that you can be both practical and visionary.

We don’t need to stop eating meat.
We just need to produce it smarter.
If tech can solve Mars, tech can solve methane.

--------------

Proofs:

(1) Environmental Impact of Modern Meat Production

FAO (2013):
Livestock = 14.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions.
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Nature (2023):
Reducing beef consumption by 90% would help meet global climate targets.

Science – Poore & Nemecek (2018):
Beef production produces 20–100× more greenhouse gas per gram of protein compared to plant sources.

(2) Meat Made Us Smarter — Anthropological Evidence

Richard Wrangham (Harvard), “Catching Fire” (2009):
Meat + cooking fueled human brain expansion.

Aiello & Wheeler, Expensive Tissue Hypothesis (Current Anthropology, 1995):
High-calorie meat allowed gut size to shrink, freeing energy for bigger brains.

Smithsonian Human Origins Program:
“Increased meat consumption provided essential fats and calories for brain growth.”

(3) Lettuce Burgers / Impossible Burger

Wired article:
https://www.wired.com/story/the-impossible-burger/

(4) Netherlands is the second-largest exporter of agricultural products.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/interactive/2022/netherlands-agriculture-technology/

(5) Moon / Space Data Centers

Financial Express:
https://www.financialexpress.com/life/technology-sundar-pichai-elon-musk-and-jeff-bezos-are-now-competing-to-establish-data-centres-on-the-moon-heres-whats-driving-the-push-4047995/

I betcha a bunch of people are asking, "Is it too late to change my vote?"

Survival of the fittest. That’s what extreme individualism and Objectivism reduce everything to. That’s what Ayn Rand argued, that selfishness is moral, and altruism is immoral.

Now imagine you’re the parent of two kids. One outperforms the other.

Are you an animal (like certain birds or predators) that abandon or starve their weaker offspring?

Are you a bug (like bees and ants) that literally kill “bad” offspring?

Or are you a human who supports both children because compassion, ethics, and morality are what separate us from the animal kingdom?

In society and politics, the real question is simple:

Are you acting like a human… or like an animal/bug?

I’m an observer looking at this mess.
Politics should never have become a team sport.

It should be “same goals, different methods" to reach them.

The polarization is ridiculous.

We’re supposed to be debating solutions, not treating politics like a loyalty test. The second someone disagrees, people act like it’s a personal betrayal instead of just a different approach. That’s not governance. That’s fan-club behavior.

Why are we even doing this whole “populism” thing?

Seriously. There’s a red version and a blue version, and they’re basically using the same playbook.

All it actually does is divide people and pump up the polarization.

I’m not seeing how that setup solves anything in the real world.

When did the fragile egos of the uninformed start outranking people with actual knowledge?
When did evidence become ‘elitist?’

I think it started when social media gave the wildest voices more reach than the most educated ones.
Flat-earthers, grifters, and conspiracy theorists got global megaphones—and people listened.

We used to shrug at the corner rambling lunatic.
Now he trends.
And the fallout is landing on all of us.

This political strategy actually is nothing new. It's more like - old tricks for new people.

See below:

https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/how-social-media-rewards-misinformation

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2010/11/24/one-more-elitism-understanding/

How Social Media Rewards Misinformation A majority of false stories are spread by a small number of frequent users, suggests a new study co-authored by Yale SOM’s Gizem Ceylan. But they can be taught to change their ways.

People actually think like this?

I feel I must say this again:

People who believe all they've ever gotten was because of personal effort when there are other factors at play: favoritism, prejudices, nepotism, and many more that skews the wishful thinking that equal effort = equal outcome. One cannot live in a protective bubble and assume the rest of the world plays by the same simple rules.

https://www.facebook.com/100077570114085/posts/870159965579666/?app=fbl