CompliancePoint
Share
Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from CompliancePoint, Business consultant, Duluth, GA.
The story has put the spotlight on the quality of auditors assessing with and frameworks. In this episode of Compliance Pointers, Carol Amick shares how to spot the red flags that your auditor may not be up to par. Click the link in the comments to learn about:
🕰️ 💲 Unrealistic price and speed promises
How involved your organization needs to be in the audit
🔬 Best practices for vetting auditors
🔎 How to vet your vendor’s SOC 2 reports
On March 25th, the Federal Communications Commission began mandating the use of SIP code 603+. For operations, this is significant for two reasons:
1. Visibility is perhaps the more immediate benefit. With 603+ now standardized, organizations that pull call detail records (CDRs) from their telephony providers can begin filtering specifically for this code. A pattern of 603+ responses on a particular outbound number is a clear signal that the number has been flagged by carrier analytics as suspected spam, something that would previously have required guesswork to identify.
2. Redress is the longer-term operational benefit. Because the 603+ Reason header contains contact information for the blocking provider, legitimate businesses that find their numbers being incorrectly flagged now have a defined path to challenge the block. This is a meaningful improvement over the previous environment, where even identifying which carrier was blocking calls often required significant investigative effort. The FCC designed this mechanism specifically to reduce the burden on legitimate callers who are caught up in analytics-based blocking despite operating within the law.
Click the link in the comments to learn more about Session Initiation Protocol technology and what businesses should do with the new rules in place.
Click here to claim your Sponsored Listing.
