PCFitment

Are you facing Overmapping or Overlapping issues in your ACES fitment catalog? 🚗⚙️

Many catalog managers struggle with duplicate applications, incorrect fitment mapping, and marketplace rejection issues.

✅ Overlapping Issue:
When two different parts share the same vehicle application, marketplaces like Advanced Auto Parts may reject the data. Using MFR Label or custom qualifiers helps separate products based on material, color, or variants.

✅ Overmapping Issue:
Adding unnecessary attributes in the fitment catalog creates inaccurate application data. The solution is to use only the required attributes based on the product and vehicle fitment.

Proper ACES/PIES data management improves catalog accuracy, reduces rejection issues, and enhances automotive eCommerce performance.

Need help with fitment mapping, ACES/PIES data, catalog validation, or marketplace compliance?

📩 Contact PCFitment today.

Single Year vs Year Range in ACES Data — Which One Should You Use? 🤔

Choosing the right year selection method in your ACES file can improve your fitment data management, reduce file size, and make marketplace uploads faster.

In this video, we explain:
✔️ When to use Single Year fitment
✔️ When Year Range is the better option
✔️ Benefits of reducing ACES file size
✔️ How manufacturers and retailers should manage fitment data
✔️ Ways to reduce human errors and maintenance time

If you work with automotive fitment data, ACES files, Amazon fitment, or multi-marketplace listings, this video will help you make the right decision.