SArt-Designs

Left to dry, done!

The author of the article uses two examples to legitimize the dunning-kruger-effect: the stereotypical pompous male and the percentiles of focus groups. Both these examples are just as limited as anything, especially when the subjectivity of biases affects the scales of predictability.

All in all, the Dunning-Kruger-Effect is inescapable. But this doesn't mean our core character is weak. It just means good faith is a moral attribute where sincerity, whether its established expertise or smoke up the rear is not the bench mark. Action and words are a two way highway. It is just, as important to walk the talk, as it is to talk the walk.

At SArt-Designs we do this by allowing the aesthetics of life and experience be the mirrors of our attitudes, skills, and knowledge. We allow the mistakes to inform not shame.

We achieve this by approaching projects in the spirit of play. To introduce and maintain relations with things and people involved in projects. As the challenges intensify we match them with effort. Blindsides do happen and they do impede. Yet, with playful attitudes that grow through the grit of effort, projects ultimately inform upon how we apply knowledge, skills, and attitudes. In total, a moral of good faith is established among the people and things of any project. It's called Relational Aesthetics.

Never would we judge someone or something, as incompetent. Only temporarily short sighted in bad faith.

Dunning-Kruger Effect: Why Incompetent People Think They Are Superior The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which the incompetent lack the skills and cognitive abilities to recognize their own inability.

Near to complete. Debating painting the music score on the book. As, a surrealist piece it seems happy either way.

The title is named after Queen's "Tie your Mother Down" because that is the page I opened when starting this still life. So, I'm seeking mental distance from the work to decide. Perhaps, others have thoughts?